<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: April Showers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.microstockposts.com/april-showers/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.microstockposts.com/april-showers/</link>
	<description>An offbeat look at the microstock industry; the stock photography phenomenon which tore up the rule book </description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2012 14:02:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Microstock Posts</title>
		<link>http://www.microstockposts.com/april-showers/comment-page-1/#comment-147</link>
		<dc:creator>Microstock Posts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 07:00:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://microstockposts.com/?p=624#comment-147</guid>
		<description>Thanks so much. Still peanuts at the moment, but the monkeys are happy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks so much. Still peanuts at the moment, but the monkeys are happy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Payal</title>
		<link>http://www.microstockposts.com/april-showers/comment-page-1/#comment-70</link>
		<dc:creator>Payal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 06:04:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://microstockposts.com/?p=624#comment-70</guid>
		<description>Well done on your sales. Hope this is only the beginning.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well done on your sales. Hope this is only the beginning.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Microstock Posts</title>
		<link>http://www.microstockposts.com/april-showers/comment-page-1/#comment-148</link>
		<dc:creator>Microstock Posts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2009 09:01:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://microstockposts.com/?p=624#comment-148</guid>
		<description>Thanks David. My last submission took me 3 weeks to choose the 10 images. Yes sales are quite astonishing, obviously the 25 cents a download has something to do with it. My editorial photos sell well too. However, i still have a 50% rejection rate. The longer you do this, the more you get used to rejections and the less it bothers you. The only big agency that won&#039;t accept my application is Stockxpert, which is ironic as I discovered &lt;a href=&quot;http://microstockposts.com/what-is-microstock/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;microstock&lt;/a&gt; through them. I even tried to humour them by applying with the username &quot;Oranghutan&quot;. Needless to say, it didn&#039;t work. However, I&#039;m not submitting to &lt;a href=&quot;http://microstockposts.com/2009/01/09/what-keywording-i-thought-i-was-a-photographer/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Istockphoto&lt;/a&gt; or Fotolia, their painful uploading processes and the high rejection rates I have with them, doesn&#039;t make it worth it. I am enjoying submitting to the few agencies I&#039;m with though. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dreamstime.com/res330539-free-photos&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Dreamstime&lt;/a&gt; is my top earner, but I&#039;m sure &lt;a href=&quot;http://submit.shutterstock.com/?ref=111598&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Shutterstock&lt;/a&gt; will eventually overtake it. David, I&#039;m sure you&#039;ll keep applying to Shutterstock, I hope you get on in fewer attempts than I did.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks David. My last submission took me 3 weeks to choose the 10 images. Yes sales are quite astonishing, obviously the 25 cents a download has something to do with it. My editorial photos sell well too. However, i still have a 50% rejection rate. The longer you do this, the more you get used to rejections and the less it bothers you. The only big agency that won&#8217;t accept my application is Stockxpert, which is ironic as I discovered <a href="http://microstockposts.com/what-is-microstock/" rel="nofollow">microstock</a> through them. I even tried to humour them by applying with the username &#8220;Oranghutan&#8221;. Needless to say, it didn&#8217;t work. However, I&#8217;m not submitting to <a href="http://microstockposts.com/2009/01/09/what-keywording-i-thought-i-was-a-photographer/" rel="nofollow">Istockphoto</a> or Fotolia, their painful uploading processes and the high rejection rates I have with them, doesn&#8217;t make it worth it. I am enjoying submitting to the few agencies I&#8217;m with though. <a href="http://www.dreamstime.com/res330539-free-photos" rel="nofollow">Dreamstime</a> is my top earner, but I&#8217;m sure <a href="http://submit.shutterstock.com/?ref=111598" rel="nofollow">Shutterstock</a> will eventually overtake it. David, I&#8217;m sure you&#8217;ll keep applying to Shutterstock, I hope you get on in fewer attempts than I did.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Fowler</title>
		<link>http://www.microstockposts.com/april-showers/comment-page-1/#comment-27</link>
		<dc:creator>David Fowler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 19:03:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://microstockposts.com/?p=624#comment-27</guid>
		<description>Congratulations Komar on getting into &lt;a href=&quot;http://submit.shutterstock.com/?ref=111598&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Shutterstock&lt;/a&gt;! I made my first attempt a couple of weeks ago and got rejected within five hours (7 of my 10 shot down for &quot;poor composition&quot;). They had all been accepted by Istock and other sites. Your initial sales sound very exciting. Even at 25c these will add up quickly once you have more files accepted. I had always thought that Istock was much the same but with 96 files and only 8 downloads to date, obviously not. Someone on Microstock group said recently that whilst it is hard to get into Shutterstock, once you are in they accept virtually everything. I have no idea if that&#039;s true (obviously!) but might suggest that they make it hard at first to cut out time wasters and non serious contributors. Just a thought. Regards, David</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congratulations Komar on getting into <a href="http://submit.shutterstock.com/?ref=111598" rel="nofollow">Shutterstock</a>! I made my first attempt a couple of weeks ago and got rejected within five hours (7 of my 10 shot down for &#8220;poor composition&#8221;). They had all been accepted by Istock and other sites. Your initial sales sound very exciting. Even at 25c these will add up quickly once you have more files accepted. I had always thought that Istock was much the same but with 96 files and only 8 downloads to date, obviously not. Someone on Microstock group said recently that whilst it is hard to get into Shutterstock, once you are in they accept virtually everything. I have no idea if that&#8217;s true (obviously!) but might suggest that they make it hard at first to cut out time wasters and non serious contributors. Just a thought. Regards, David</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

